King approved by his people - survey
MBABANE – His Majesty King Mswati III is among the majority of African leaders who have earned approval from their people.
The King received a majority vote from the Swazi people in a survey conducted by Gallup Poll, a research-based performance management consulting company, that specifically conducts regular public opinion polls in over 140 countries worldwide.
His Majesty’s popularity even surpasses that of renowned leaders such as the United States of America’s President Barack Obama and British Prime Minister, David Cameron.
The approval of Obama and Cameron fell short to that of the King by six percentage points.
According to the Gallup website, the results are based on face-to-face interviews with 1 000 adults aged 15 and older conducted between November 13 and November 21 last year.
English and siSwati languages, the kingdom’s two official dialects, were used during the survey. The state of economy, according to Gallup Poll, "does have an influence on Africans’ assessments of their country’s leader, at least to some extent".
Further, confidence in the judicial system elicits similar levels of approval ratings, Gallup said.
At the time the survey was conducted, Swaziland was experiencing its worst financial crisis that triggered a number of protests from labour organisations and banned political entities.
Civil servants were disenchanted as government had proposed a cut in their salaries, as per the recommendations of the International Monetary Fund.
The kingdom was also struggling to pay the salaries of civil servants because of cash constraints.
Neighbouring South Africa also held back a E2.4 billion loan that it had initially approved for Swaziland and this stance fuelled the kingdom’s fiscal difficulties.
Judicially, Swaziland was faced with a serious crisis that saw a High Court judge being dismissed and lawyers engaging in a boycott of the country’s courts.
Despite these challenges, the interviewees approved of His Majesty’s leadership, even the renowned Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe received lower ratings than the monarch.
The King’s approval was rated alongside the likes of South Africa’s President, Jacob Zuma, Ghana’s John Atta Mills and Mauritania’s Mohamed Ould Aziz, with only two percentage points separating these leaders’ ratings.
Lesotho Prime Minister, Phakalithi Mosisili, Democratic Republic of Congo President, Joseph Kabila, Malawi’s deceased leader, Bingu Wa Mutharika, Senegal’s President, Abdoulaye Wade, Zambia’s Rupiah Banda, Comoros’ Ikililou Dhoinine and Angola’s Jose Eduardo dos Santos also received lower approval ratings compared to His Majesty.
Why are we being told part of the story. What is the approval rate? Let me cut the slack - 56% approve (560 out of 1000). That is shocking statistic given that there is no legally recognised opposition in Swaziland. This implies 440 out of 1000 people would rather have nothing than the status quo.
May 9, 2012, 12:25 AM, Elizah Kunene (firstname.lastname@example.org)
This is good news. It shows the Gallup Poll is not biased, that's why I'm in agreement with it. However, the story is incomplete because you didn't tell us the scores of the Approval Ratings regarding the regional leaders you've cited. Or is it a matter of self-censorship? Also, I have a dilemma because only a few days ago the official statement from government (through Percy) was that this Gallup Poll is not to be trusted. He sheepishly used the examples of 7 girlfriends (where does he get all these dated analogies because they're so 1970's!). Anyway, now the Gallup Poll has thankfully rated His Majesty very highly, while having rated government dismally. Please, I want to know what's government got to say now. Should we disregard the Poll as false in line with Government's position? Somebody please help me out here.
May 9, 2012, 12:25 AM, Keep Exhaling (kplm@mail)
Good journalism requires facts first, analysis later. Why did this article not contain the facts that over 40% of the people were brave enough to express dissatisfaction to strangers? This is an issue of national importance. Gallup is a reputable organisation, they have no interest in skewing the result. The Times should not be glossing over the facts, but investigating why so many people feel this way.
May 9, 2012, 12:25 PM, Laura Norder (email@example.com)