Home | News | DOES CIRCUMCISION HELP?

DOES CIRCUMCISION HELP?

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

MBABANE – Last week, the Times SUNDAY revealed how the national circumcision drive was marred by certain anomalies.
One of these was that young boys below the age of 12 were being tested for HIV before they were circumcised.


The irregularity was that these children were then informed of their HIV status, much against the spirit of the Children Welfare and Protection Act, 2012.
Even though millions of Emalangeni are channelled yearly towards male circumcision, this has not yet helped decrease the rate of HIV infections in Swaziland.
Two national surveys have revealed that circumcision has not played a very significant role as far as decreasing new HIV infections among men.


The Swaziland Demographic and Health Survey (SDHS) survey of 2007 revealed that the relationship between HIV prevalence and circumcision status was not taking the expected direction.
The report stated that circumcised men had a slightly higher HIV infection rate than men who were not circumcised (22 per cent compared with 20 per cent).
“It is worth noting that the relationship between male circumcision and HIV infection may be compounded by the fact that the circumcision may not involve the full removal of the foreskin, which provides partial protection,” reads the report in part.


The SDHS survey was conducted by the Central Statistical Office (CSO).
Its aim was to provide the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MOHSW), other Government of Swaziland institutions and agencies working in the health and social services arena, with the information needed to plan and monitor programmes on HIV.


However, the Swaziland HIV Incidence Measurement Survey (SHIMS) tells a more positive story, as far as circumcision is concerned.
The study found that a majority of Swazi men remained uncircumcised.
The SHIMS is a multi-phased study that measures HIV prevalence and incidence before and after the scale-up of circumcision.  The SHIMS was initiated in 2010, to assess the population-level impact of Soka Uncobe (a male circumcision project) in the context of other HIV prevention initiatives.


The survey identified a national HIV prevalence of 31 per cent among adults aged between 18 and 49.
“It appears that the overall HIV prevalence in Swaziland has remained nearly the same over the past five years. The expansion of HIV prevention, care and treatment services since 2006 is likely a significant factor for this possible stabilisation,” reads the SHIMS report in part.


It was reported that prevalence of male circumcision among those aged between 18 and 49 in Swaziland had doubled from eight per cent (CSO 2007) to 16 per cent.
One positive of the study was that, while the vast majority of Swazi men remained uncircumcised, most were aware of the benefits.


Also, in contrast, the smaller rise in HIV prevalence among men 35 and older may indicate that HIV-infected men in Swaziland are not benefitting from use of HIV Testing and Counselling (HTC) or ARV treatment services.
The SHIMS also reported that circumcised men in Swaziland did not engage in risky sexual behaviour and were more likely to have been tested for HIV, compared to uncircumcised men. 

“HIV prevalence was significantly lower in circumcised men, reinforcing the evidence for a protective effect of male circumcision provided as a population-level (non-research) intervention,” reads the SHIMS.
This information comes as donor agencies are channelling millions of Emalangeni in efforts to get men and young boys circumcised. 


In May 2014, it was reported that the United States Agency for International Development (UNAIDS) sponsored a programme in 2011 to circumcise 150 000 males but it failed, as only 11 000 were circumcised. The Population Services International (PSI) Swaizland is also presently engaged in a programme to circumcise 2 500 boys before the opening of schools.
This programme has been criticised by organisations championing children’s rights because it involves testing the children and telling them their HIV status.

Comments (6 posted):

Mark Lyndon on 31/08/2014 13:29:07
avatar
Swazi men are *more* likely to have HIV if they've been circumcised:

Rate of HIV among intact men in Swaziland: 19.5%
Rate of HIV among circumcised men in Swaziland: 21.8%

(figures from Measure DHS)

There are at least nine other African countries where men are *more* likely to be HIV+ if they've been circumcised. Why then is male circumcision being promoted to prevent HIV?

Europeans don't circumcise, South Americans don't circumcise, Australians and New Zealanders used to circumcise but stopped, most North Americans don't circumcise. Why should Africans circumcise?
Cole on 01/09/2014 09:35:40
avatar
Circumcision doesn't stop HIV/AIDs. CONDOMS DO.
Gary Harryman on 01/09/2014 09:37:28
avatar
This foreskin-amputation-prevents/cures-something is a medical scam - quackery. Every ten years for the last 150 years medical doctors have claimed circumcision will prevent or cure the disease de jour - 237 various conditions and diseases. First it "cured" leprosy and syphilis and then it "cured" tuberculosis and promiscuity, then herpes and HIV/AIDS. All it ever really does is make the victim subnormal for life and 5 times more likely to have erection problems at an early age.
Jackie No on 03/09/2014 16:01:09
avatar
The mutilation just causes sexual dysfunction-- a loss of sexual pleasure and function for life and the poor sods still need to wear CONDOMS!!!!!!!!!Rational people need to stop this genital mutilation campaign pushed by those that want everyone to join in their sexual DYSFUNCTION.
whatUneverknew on 04/09/2014 17:32:10
avatar
Don't be fooled. Big pharma is after your children's genitals. The US is ENDING circumcision after 100 years (and we have 3X the rate of HIV than Europe) and the MARKET (yes, that means bu$ine$$) for infant foreskins (used in medicine and cosmetics) needs to move somewhere else. DON'T BE THEIR VICTIMS! Protect your children.
Stormwatch on 04/09/2014 20:14:01
avatar
Circumcision reduces sensation. With that, men are less inclined to use condoms. Logically, circumcision will only increase HIV rates.

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image: