Home | Letters | Pushing needles into our babies

Pushing needles into our babies

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
image A wing of the Mbabane Government Hospital.

Sir,

Thank you for publishing my letter and others before. It makes me happy to see that some companies have had the decency to at least call urine rain when it comes to genetically modified organism (GMO) food, as shown in your sister publication on Tuesday, June 11, 2013 on Page 12.


Hopefully, others will follow suit as more people become aware.
Contrary to popular belief, I am not a madman.
That is true, expert psychiatric opinion.


Now, when I say the Ministry of Health is seriously taking us into a pit, I believe it is not because of paranoia. 
Some Europeans have said that just because you are not paranoid, does not mean they are not out to get you.
Imagine this scenario: A vaccine is a substance made from germs that cause a particular disease, especially smallpox, given to a person or animal to prevent him or her from catching that disease.


Introduced in the 18th century, vaccination has been practised to protect many children from various threats, from smallpox to influenza (I am not trying to make fun of anyone, honestly but influenza? seriously?).


Thanks to Edward Jenner, smallpox was contained and no longer became a threat but just another bug.
When I was born, I had vaccinations done on me for polio, and many other things that are reputed to be caused by germs. I did not get polio.
I did not, to the best of my knowledge, catch smallpox. I did, however, catch various bugs from playing in the dirt and eating boogers.
I am glad there were no HIV tests back then or I would be toast. Fast-forward to 2010.
The Ministry of Health, like other equivalents in many countries, was dishing out vaccinations as they had been doing since just before AIDS became an issue.


Babies were already getting multiple vaccinations up to the age of five.
True story: A baby who was about 10 months old was vaccinated, routinely, against measles.
A month later, there was an outbreak of German measles.


At that time, the baby was due for weighing, so the child was taken to a clinic.
The nurse, whose name shall remain unknown, told the parents that the child would also receive immunisation against measles.


Declared


They quickly declared that the child had just been vaccinated the previous month at another clinic.
The nurse responded by saying it did not matter, since this vaccination was on account of the outbreak. Wait for it...The parents asked why the vaccination done the previous month was insufficient to protect the child against the outbreak just a month after.


The nurse told them that even though the child was vaccinated, he could still catch the disease.
Puzzled, the parents asked whether there was any purpose to this second vaccination, since by the nurse’s admission, the child was virtually still unprotected.


That is when the nurse said it was required - like “I’m just doing my job, we were told to do it’’ but not in those words. Not hearsay for me. I was there, listening.
A little bird tells me the child got the measles anyway... this year, 2013.


Another clinic, this time in a rural community, was enforcing a vaccination campaign, for all children five years and under.
A nurse there was explaining matters to the mothers and fathers who had brought their children for vaccination.  He stood under a banner advertising the vaccination programme - five germs in one.


He said the children would get vaccinated (for measles) whether they had been vaccinated against it before or not. He qualified ‘before’’ by stating that even if the child was vaccinated just the previous day or two days back, he or she would be vaccinated again on that day.
I saw the same puzzled frowns I had seen three years ago in the city.
He further explained that the children would receive a mark on their right hands - at least he pointed at his right hand. One mother told me it is placed on their fingernails. I wonder still what that was for.
I will not speculate, though.


One thing I have learnt from all of this is that, in spite of all the hard work the nurses are doing, they also do not know why they are doing it.
They are simply pushing needles into babies because it is their duty.
They cannot explain why vaccines are not immunising children against diseases - or maybe they can... Please. Another thing I know about vaccines is that, on top of being useless, they pose a certain risk to fertility.

The American multibillionaire, Bill Gates, is a proponent of such campaigns.
He says it will help to reduce the population - although he says it is because people will have fewer children if they live longer. Ahem.
Vaccines will help people to live longer and bring the population down to half a billion eventually.


So, could the ministry please explain to me and a few puzzled parents, what these vaccinations contain, besides so-called germs?
While they are at it, may they please explain what dangers are posed by unvaccinated children to vaccinated ones at pre-schools, if vaccines actually work? I thank you.

Ngedvwajwi
MBABANE


Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image: