OVER E600 000 TENDER FOR EZULWINI VALUATION

MBABANE – Christian Amoako stands to be granted a tender worth over E600 000 by the Ezulwini Municipality.

The exact value of the contract that could be entered into between the municipality and the company for preparation of the general valuation roll for 2017/18 is E690 590.59.

This follows an evaluation exercise undertaken by the municipal’s tender Board in accordance with the Public Procurement Act of 2011.
In tender results issued by the Swaziland Public Procurement Regulatory Agency (SPPRA), it was disclosed that Christian Amoako scored 88 per cent. This was based on a 70 per cent technical score and 30 per cent financial score.

The total number of companies that had submitted bids for the job was five, two of which could not meet the minimum technical score.
MM Property Consultants emerged as the second best evaluated tenderer, with an 81 per cent score and a bid price of E867 043.

The third-best tenderer was Swazi Reality Consultant (Pty) Ltd, which managed to amass 67 per cent points and had the highest bid of E1.1 million.
The municipality clarified that the intention to award did not constitute a contract. It announced that a period of 10 working days would be allowed for the submission of any application for review in line with the Act.

It should be mentioned Christian Amoako continues to showcase its competitive edge since it was recently enlisted as the best evaluated tenderers for the valuation of King Mswati III International Airport.

It was disclosed that the exact amount of money that Christian Amoako stood to cash in for the project was E643 800.75.
The company outsmarted six other companies that had tendered for evaluation of the country’s international airport.

Scored

The company reportedly scored 90.8 per cent upon evaluation.
It was closely followed by Mabuza Masina Property Consultants, which scored 74.3 per cent upon evaluation.
Two other companies that were also vying for the same tender were disqualified, while another two were rejected for being below the benchmark.
The tender results were issued in accordance with the Procurement Act of 2011 as well.

Post your comment

Your name:

Your e-mail address:

Add your comments:

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Image:

Code: